Categories
Rubriques

I.M.Jack – Global Edition

It’s been a long time since I went for the “round-up” style post but here is one for all kinds of tastes. Straight from the heart of eurodoubt we take a quick look at what’s going on in the world around us – and obviously pepper a few of our own comments. (and videos from the euronews youtube feed)

1. Plagiarism on the Independent
Well it’s not Malta’s Independent but the UK’s. Journalist and columnist Johann Hari made a public apology and promised to return the “George Orwell Prize” that he had been awarded after he admitted to having committed what he called “two wrong and stupid things”. The first “stupid thing” might not even sound like plagiarism to some but gives us a good example of the rigors of professional journalism. Hari was accused of replacing interviewees words with similar clips taken from books or articles elsewhere. The words used were by the same interviewees but they were not the ones they used in the interview.

The second “stupid thing” turns out to be really stupid. Hari adopted a user-name in order to edit Wikipedia entries. Here is his admission of his faults in this second error:

I factually corrected some other entries about other people. But in a few instances, I edited the entries of people I had clashed with in ways that were juvenile or malicious: I called one of them anti-Semitic and homophobic, and the other a drunk. I am mortified to have done this, because it breaches the most basic ethical rule: don’t do to others what you don’t want them to do to you. I apologise to the latter group unreservedly and totally.

Hari admitted plagiarism and publicly apologised for his actions. In addition to that ” (Hari) is to take four months’ unpaid leave to undertake a programme of journalism training at his own expense. He will also return the Orwell Prize which was awarded to him in 2008. ” (see Independent columnist apologises for plagiarism).

2. Governments Abroad

If you take a break from the PLPN hyperreality where Muscat sells mystery policies and Caruana Galizia and Bondi still peddle Mintoff as current affairs you will find a whole new world beyond the borders of good old Melita. In that world the German Constitutional Court has just delivered an important judgement that clears the way for Merkel’s plans to help the euro by helping the Greeks. Meanwhile, the markets remain nervous and shaky with different messages not helping to stabilise the environment.

Italy‘s “manovra” was pushed through as bombe carta exploded outside the Senate house but the “austerity” bill that was announced includes measures that are prone to bring the unions to the streets and the country to an unhelpful standstill. Berlusconi failed to tax the rich and seems to still believe that the less successful can help carry the burden of the crisis.

French banks were left wondering what hit them when Moody decided to downgrade the ratings for giants Société Générale and Credit Agricole among others. The downgrade was put down to the lack of confidence in the French banks due to “the increasing vulnerabilities of the market“. Meanwhile the bid to become Presidential candidate for the PS begins in earnest as the six candidates vowed to oppose each other but not to argue/fight.

UK banks seem to have survived the current tests but are also subject to warnings that the new rules could stretch their finances. (Telegraph) In his article on the Telegraph economist Andrew Lilico explains why the death of the euro could also mean the death of the EU. Analysis and reaction to recent events by major politicians have prompted calls for a rewriting of the treaty and even a call for a Federal Europe.

Maastricht, Amsterdam and Lisbon seem to have been the wrong antidote to the deepening vs widening argument that plagued Europe in the nineties and noughties. It should come as no surprise that once again economic realties push the reluctant continent into some long-awaited decision making about its future form.

 

Facebook Comments Box

Categories
Values

Qatar

It’s official. Malta is one of the safest places on earth (bar Qatar). Apparently the Maltese archipelago is one of the zones of the earth that is least prone to natural disasters with a 0.72% risk of such an abomination occurring. There is one country that is safer and that country is Qatar (0.2% risk). While I was reading this fact sometime yesterday it struck me that this was the second time that I thought of Qatar and Malta at the same time.

Qatar, a Gulf state that has hitherto lived in the shadow of its giant neighbour Saudi Arabia is living a gold age. Success story follows success story with social improvements and business stories being the daily staple diet of the Qatari people. Sure, they have been well treated by mother nature since they do not only sit on the safest real estate on the planet but it also happens to be a source of black gold. It’s not just that though. It’s what the Qataris are doing with it that is fantastic. They have large scale projects, a modern society that has attracted major sporting events (FIFA World Cup anyone?) and smart investments. Qatar was given a heads up by mother nature and capitalised on the consequences.

Hearing a report on France Culture about Qatar’s success story I couldn’t help but wonder how important it is for a nation to realise its assets and capitalise on them quickly and efficiently. It also means investing wisely and pushing for the right marketing….

Just think about this. The Malta Tourism Authority decided to sponsor a team in the UK in order to raise Malta’s profile among the Brit tourist crowd. Who did we choose? For some obscure reason it was Sheffield United. Now much as I might think that the blades have a wonderful footballing pedigree steeped in history I cannot but question whether this partnership was well thought out.

Back to Qatar. Next time you see Barcelona skip onto the field in their Champion’s League outfit take a look at the sponsor on their shirts. Let me just add that Barcelona were famous for being one of the largest teams that obstinately refused to accept a shirt sponsorship for a very long time before finally accepting to carry “UNICEF” in the place of advertising. Well UNICEF is there no more. Do you know which country’s name sits proudly on the chest of Xavi, Iniesta and Messi while they weave their magic infront of a global audience?

Yep. You guessed it. Qatar. In the form of the Qatar Foundation. Here’s the vision statement from their website:

an independent, private, non-profit, chartered organization founded in 1995 by decree of His Highness Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani, Amir of the State of Qatar, to support centers of excellence which develop people’s abilities through investments in human capital, innovative technology, state of the art facilities and partnerships with elite organizations, thus raising the competency of people and the quality of life.

And here is their mission statement:

Qatar Foundation’s mission is to prepare the people of Qatar and the region to meet the challenges of an ever-changing world, and to make Qatar a leader in innovative education and research. To achieve that mission, QF  supports a network of centers and partnerships with elite institutions, all committed to the principle that a nation’s greatest natural resource is its people. Education City, Qatar Foundation’s flagship project is envisioned as a Center of Excellence in education and research that will help transform Qatar into a knowledge-based society.

Now that’s what I would call smart.

 

Facebook Comments Box

Categories
Mediawatch

An Apology to Manuel Cuschieri

Dear Manuel,

I don’t really know you. I’ve never met you and I cannot even claim to have heard any of your radio programmes that shot you to notoriety and turned you into a household name synonymous with political mud-slinging in the days of Alfred Sant. I might have criticised your brother for his lack of political sense and his hopeless career as the 6th seat that never was and I will probably do so again since such criticism falls well within the  rules of the game.

The fact that I do not really know you does not mean that I am  not obliged to deal with you in the manner that any respectable citizen deserves to be treated by a columnist and blogger. However, I believe that I still owe you an apology.

I owe you an apology for having compared you to Daphne Caruana Galizia. True, Daphne is no foreigner to mud-slinging and engages daily in the “guilt by association” tactic that has been perfected to a tee by our wonderful political class. But you see, Manuel, you were not half as sophisticated in your tirades in your time. You might have tried to repeat lies to no end in the hope that the gushing followers of your rants would take your word as the gospel truth.

In fact, forgive me if I say that the similarity she bears with your style in this case is uncanny. The thing is that in your case you might have sold lies. You were just an evangelist, a propaganda peddler, eager to drum your gospel into your unquestioning flock’s psyche. Daphne goes one better. She denigrates by implication, and moves on to unhesitatingly savage even people who are remotely affiliated or connected to any of her pet hates.  You might have seen your enemy as one big anonymous blue blob. But your rallying cry is nothing compared to her Facebook forays and ISP indictments. It’s all about taking a half- truth, a sweeping assumption,  another desperate pigeonhole, and creatively moulding a hundred links by spurious association.

There comes a time when there need be no factual lien between her targets. Take the manner in which time and again Daphne has peddled the idea that J’accuse is somehow involved in some pro-Labour or pro-AD conspiracy. Our name is dropped in the middle of a rant against a fellow columnist simply based on the hopeless claim that J’accuse is somehow fixated on being anti-PN. I’m sorry, Manuel, but your “the enemy of my enemy” line has been worn out of all recognition. Daphne is desperate to slam the Labour/AD label on this blog without once engaging on the matters which this blog has raised time and time again. Take the “Why now?” issue…. it’s too complicated to answer, is it? Better apply some of the good old mud-slinging tactic and throw in some non-sensical statements like “remote controlled blog” (What is a remote controlled blog anyway, Manuel? Can you tell me?)

By the way, Manuel, in case you mistakenly believe that there might be more for me to apologise about : I’m not the one who  compared you to Lou Bondì.  You must admit that if it is style and method that we are talking about, the description fits like a tailor-made glove. However, Manuel, I did not come up with that comparison myself and  I always give credit where credit is due. Lou’s another one who seems to have been perfecting  your style for some time. Don’t worry, he rarely takes criticism head on so he’s bound to claim never to have read anything about this comparison. He doesn’t need to anyway, there’s always Daphne to do the business for him. You know… a sneaky message and a call here… a mud-slinging blog post there…. There must be lots of back scratching going on.

So there Manuel. I’m sorry. I’m sorry to have compared you to the masters of modern day mud-slinging and grudge-bearing slurs. You were just the primitive precursor of this new politics. Your legacy however seems to be guaranteed a dark and slimy future whether or not you return to grace the radio-waves (please don’t).

So, Manuel, if you did find my comparing you to Daphne Caruana Galizia to be in any way jarring or insulting, then I take it back. In any case… she’s much better than you in doing what you used to do…  but I guess you knew that already.

Saħħiet.

Facebook Comments Box

Categories
Euroland

Crisiswatch

Controversial historian Niall Ferguson sees no solution for the current European Debt Crisis which he describes as a “European Lehman Brothers“. Are we really in for a shocker? Is the biggest strike still to be dealt on the European economy? Will the euro suffer the consequences? Worse still, is it – as Joseph Muscat would have it – the fault of GonziPN?

Facebook Comments Box

Categories
Articles

J’accuse : Civil society and its enemies

I remember perfectly where I was 10 years ago today. I was at home, sick with a heavy dose of “man-flu” (a newly added term to the Oxford dictionary) zapping through tv channels rather disinterestedly when the news broke and the crawl at the foot of most channels led me directly to the live coverage on CNN. The horrible scenes of panic and disorder as Hollywood-style pictures were screened live into living room televisions the world over brought home the savage dawn of a new era.

Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda had struck directly at the heart of what for many was the norm of civil society. What is arguably the world’s most metropolitan city was ending its night shift (you cannot use the phrase “waking up” for the city that never sleeps) and the al Qaeda directors scripted a new dawn calculated to instil terror in the heart of civil society. These were not the bullets and bombs that were the choice weapons of the hitherto “conventional” terror organisations. No, al Qaeda’s cruel orchestration required that civilian transport and civilian buildings would transform into weapons of mass destruction.

It takes a second to wreck it

Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek has written about the two epic moments in recent history and how they signified important turning points for civil society. Fate has it that the dates of the two events are palindromic once we remove the year (a game for conspiracy theorists but nothing more than a coincidence). On the one hand, if we use the US system of writing dates (month/day) we have 11/9 or November 9th 1989 when the Berlin Wall finally fell. That day was declared to be the end of history and the beginning of a liberal-democrat utopia.

The 11/9 era was to come to a crashing stop on 9/11 (September 11th 2001) − after almost 12 years of the liberal-democrat utopia. Zizek argues that “real history” came crashing back into focus. With the onslaught of terror began the gradual crumbling of the liberal dream best typified by the tightening of the noose on civil liberties by governments acting in the name of the “War on Terror”. As Zizek put it, we entered a time when a state of peace became also a permanent state of emergency as the distinction between war and peace became blurred.

It takes time to build

The shoestring budget terror attack catapulted the world into a new set of paradigms and we are still bearing the consequences of the political shifts that were involved. It took a few seconds to strike at the heart of civil society. It will take time to rebuild. Meanwhile, the world (and to a great extent most of civil society) is also trying to weather the economic hurricane that has been besieging its normality for almost three years now. “Le borse affondano” is the latest title in the economy pages of La Stampa. The troubles in Europe have shifted to the sacred cows of “government bonds”, and the resignation of the German Starke from the European Central Bank this weekend sent shockwaves that “burnt” €157 billion on the markets.

Milan, Frankfurt, Paris − all the markets suffered the shock as governments try desperately to tackle problem after problem. Deficit reduction, spending reduction and other such bywords have become the daily crux for the European 27. Italy has just managed to squeeze through a budget of sorts (La Manovra) while hear in Malta we are still trying to digest Moody’s downward revision of our credit rating. These are big signs in important times and the reactions from the Opposition benches are bafflingly petty, provincial and transparently populist.

It is a sad truth of the Maltese reality that Muscat’s posturing and finger-pointing about the economy will be swallowed hook, line and sinker by the world of the “disgruntled”. It is those very same disgruntled who will eventually be voting “by default” for a Labour government that claims to have the solution to all the problems but seems to prefer to hold the cards close to its chest. Presumably that is because the solutions can only work with a Labour government in place − either that or the solutions are as real as the Tooth Fairy.

The Rule of Law

That Joseph Muscat and his party can peddle hot air as concrete party policies comes as no surprise to this columnist. The fuel for (all) the power circles in our community is all made from the same material where opportunism trumps diligence, where nepotism trumps merit and where the imperatives of populist policies have eroded the value base, which could have provided a proper compass and direction. Our nation’s assault on civil society did not come out of the sky in the form of planes but has been a gradual process of erosion much like the Mediterranean battering against our rock formations.

This week the Plategate saga shot back to the headline news. A defamation case that has been dragging on for some time now is actually the scene for much more important and crucial allegations about the workings in institutions that are important to the stability and functioning of our civil society. Beneath the pink news and name-calling lie facts that have finally (and it took them quite some time) begun to bother those among us who manage to attract the most attention and make the most noise.

It’s not like many of the allegations were not already within the grapevines and Chinese whispers of our society. Malta’s civil society is more and more dependent on the wink-wink nudge-nudge philosophy where standards vanish in order to accommodate the latest johnny-come-lately. Profession after profession has been succumbing to the new rules of the game as the words “ethics”, “standards” and “values” are ditched for the sake of social expediency.

The lack of public trust in politicians and institutions is doomed to get worse. Our society desperately needs a ground up change in order to reinvest in the lost values and reconstruct its ailing institutions. Unfortunately, it is beginning to seem that everyone under the sun has a vested interest in one power circle or other that is the main culprit for the erosion of our civil society. That sad indictment will be written once again come next election. It may take time to build, but unless we realise the proper foundations and adopt a winning philosophy it all risks crumbling to the ground all over again.

Welcome home

The inauguration of the new Juventus stadium on Thursday was a moving and thrilling experience. The words class, style and pride formed the perfect framework for the event that was described as the birth of a new era in Italian football. Juventus too has been forced to rise from the ashes as the team attempts to shed the effects of an unjust and unequal application of a twisted legal system. I am looking forward to the day when the team of shame visits our stadium and while they are preparing in the changing room they will face the 29 scudetti won by Italy’s most loved. Juventus too has adopted a philosophy inherited from the Agnelli family: “At Juventus winning is not the most important thing. It is the only thing that counts.”

Fino alla fine.

 

This article and accompanying bertoon appeared in today’s Malta Independent on Sunday.

Facebook Comments Box

Categories
Sport

Welcome Home

…i risultati conseguiti sul campo… un campo verde come questo… solcato da linee bianche che definiscono il nostro destino. Linee che non mentono. Perche il campo dice sempre la verità. Un prato come questo che ha consacrato 29 volte Campione di Italia….

Facebook Comments Box