Even More Lessons in Irrelevance

It’s the battle of the leaks. You can barely read a bit of news nowadays without a leak being mentioned somewhere or other. So who gave the game away to the Nationalist party that Dr Sant had a trick up his sleeve? Who gave away the hints that it would be Mistra and that JPO would be the target? Who in the Nationalist party leaked the parts of the contract to the Labour party so that they could make a meal out of JPO? Who knew about the leaks? Who stayed mum?

You hear so much about the leaks going this way and that that after a while you forget what was actually leaked. Then you get caught in the cross-fire discussing the leaks and before you know it Joseph Muscat is accusing the PN of being inconsistent in their lies (you can only lie consistently).  It’s a short step away from Alice’s Wonderland. It’s not so much reading the news as deciphering it. After a while you really have to take a deep breath and wonder – but what is all this really about?

What do we learn from the leaks business? Not much really. We already knew that both our main political parties could number enough slime-balls among them to be able to throw a successful Back Stab Themed Party (no harm or pun intended). We learnt that at some point in the campaign someone in the nationalist party found out about JPO’s Mistra dealings and started a damage limitation exercise because the Labour party were onto the said dealings.

We learnt that the damage limitation exercise is what we saw unfold before our eyes – the hounding of Alfred Sant by watery eyed JPO. The PN provided him with a press card (Press Ethics? What Press Ethics?) they shuttled him around yelling at the Leader of the Opposition like a mad man. And now we have it on the authority of Gordon Pisani (PN Communications man) that the services of Daphne Caruana Galizia were enrolled in order to ghost write an article for the hapless dentist who in the meantime kept (according to the latter day version) lying through his teeth about the Mistra situation.

Now we don’t really care whether DCG is ghost writing per amor patriae (dulce et decorum est) or for mercenary remuneration (or we wouldn’t care had this actually not been denied many a time when the question was asked) – her work, her business, her rewards after all. After all we too share the immense fear of seeing Joseph Muscat elected to government come next election so we should keep mum about the fishy picture that is emerging here.

It’s hard really for the non-partisan observer to separate the wheat from the chaff. We’ve hardly begun to ask the questions actually. The problem is that no one has. The press are busy reporting allegations about leak and counter leak but fail to want to dig deeper. And when people like Daphne ask very pertinent questions  .- such as was the RCC conversation that appeared on ONE News the result of an illegal phone tap – you cannot help but remember that this is a person who ghost writes for the spin machine of one party so there is always the suspicion of a tint of bias. Incidentally, the Super ONE spin on that conversation is one hell of a mindfu*k. Implika????

The Labour party is having a free ride on non-sequiturs, basing itself on the biggest non-sequitur of all: if the others are swimming in shit then we must be right. Joseph Muscat is on a roll sending irrelevant message after irrelevant message out to the electorate without even trying to fake any interest in real policy and real ideas. There they go again cracking stupid jokes about Gonzi’s Coalition with JPO and how this is about “Flimkien Kollox Possibli”. The Labour party was even unable to see the real purpose of this parliamentary recess and is still hoping that some new twist will happen that will precipitate the end of this government. They still think JPO is relevant. They still have no idea about how the constitution works and how governments are formed or fall. Yes, the Labour machine is still fuelled by ignorance.

Do you know who the biggest loser is? The biggest loser in all this is the voter. The more I speak to people the more I get the same reply. “U mhux kollox jibqa l-istess la jghaddi dan kollu. Flok buzillis wiehed ikun hemm iehor u xorta jien inhallas u nidghi“.

Well,  at least our quoting Tommasi di Lampedusa millions of times in the past eight years might finally make sense.

Because yes, once the fireworks are over, once the cacophony dies down and the new die is cast then you realise that for all the main protagonists in this saga there is one thing that is more irrelevant than anything else – and that is you… the voter.

Or in the words of the Italian poet (yes, the Italian of Espresso, Panorama and Corriere della Sera):

Perché io sono io, e voi non siete un cazzo.

 

 

 

Facebook Comments Box

More Lessons in Irrelevance

So he resigned. Not much to be surprised about there. It’s a miracle that the cohabitation had survived so long into the legislature but then again he has had his moments and the government has had to survive more than its fair share of confidence votes thanks to the likes of the newly resigned MP and his colleague Franco Debono. We now know for a fact that the PN election team were conned by the tantrum throwing dentist – and whether by force majeure for want of anything better they set about ghost writing articles and driving home the idea of JPO the victim until a day after the election.

Once the election was over they had a time bomb ticking in the house. Four years ago it was only the inner circle of campaign directors, executive members and spin consultants that knew of the big con. Then slowly JPO uncovered his cars. The more he went maverick the more it was clear that not all was united in the PN house. The divorce bill last year was one of the final straws so to speak. All the while their mouths stayed mum. The ticking bomb was left to tick. They could not do otherwise – the slim majority precluded them from kicking out the man who had garnered over 5,000 number one votes thanks to their hardy work. Damn.

Nobody spoke of government by coalition then even though it was always clear that the band of representatives flying the PN banner was anything but a unified party supporting the same ideas. Again, just look at the divorce vote and see what I mean. This was no coalition in fact. It was uncomfortable cohabitation. The couple was in trouble big time and domestic disagreements could only be kept quiet in order to give the outside impression of a united facade.

Coalitions arise after elections when two or more parties need to combine the number of seats they have in order to enjoy a majority in the house. Before they agree on a coalition they take a long hard look at their electoral programmes and see how much of each one will survive into the coalition. Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando is not in a coalition with the Nationalist Party. In his resignation letter he stresses that he will continue to work with the Nationalist party in order to implement the electoral programme. That would not make it a coalition. Worse still, JPO has already – repeatedly – operated outside the nationalist party’s electoral programme.

From the moment he conned the party’s intelligentia with his Mistra move to this day he has blatantly operated against the interests of the party he supposedly represented in parliament. That is not a coalition. That is a renegade, a rebel, a splinter – call it what you like but don’t call it a coalition.

Comparing the uncomfortable cohabitation between Gonzi’s PN and Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando to a coalition is either a petty example of political spin or a manifestation of crass political ignorance.

The comparison to a coalition is irrelevant.

Facebook Comments Box

Right Said Fred

So he was right was he? I always wondered when would be the right time to make some cheeky reference to Right Said Fred when writing about Alfred Sant. The jubilant Labourites have given me just that opportunity: Alfred Was Right… yeah he was…. right said Fred… I’m too sexy for my….

 

Facebook Comments Box

Lessons in irrelevance

You may think that I was wrong in the last post (The Last Interview) when I said that the relevance of JPO to the current political scenario is fading fast. The “rebel MP” is once again  sitting on top of the latest news items and the question that Times journalist Kurt Sansone asks is “Will rebel MP pull the plug?

Well. I was not wrong at all. Pullicino Orlando’s relevance is directly related to the power he can wield to making or breaking the government. Kurt Sansone answers this himself thusly:

“If he does resign from the party but retains his parliamentary seat as an independent, the government would lose its one-seat majority. Although it would precipitate a political crisis, the impact is not immediate. Parliament is closed for the summer recess until October 1 and the government’s majority would have to be ascertained by a vote of confidence.”

My point exactly. A point I have been making ever since the Thursday executive vote banning the three rebel MPs from contesting the next election. The PN strategy is clear. Summer is for preparing the electoral onslaught.

Gonzi’s men knew that the slim majority could not survive far beyond October – and even if by some miracle of patchwork and self-denial they would have managed to drag to 2013 (as some believed Gonzi intended to do) they were aware that they would lose more points than gain should they pander to the tantrum throwing rebels.

Which is why parliament took the long recess. It will open up in time for the inauguration of the new buildings and the official declaration of an electoral campaign opening. Everything else is media speculation. As I said in an earlier post, what remains to be seen is whether Gonzi will hand the self-destruct button to JPO or Franco Debono by forcing a confidence vote. That way the blame/pride for bringing about the end of the legislature will fall clearly on a rebel MP.

Lesson in relevance number one: Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando is irrelevant. Whatever he says or does from now on does not change anything in the dynamics of the approach to an election. Any remaining “scoops” he may provide will only serve to fuel the hungry media machine (hey… it’s summer) and Labour’s grateful politicians who will pick up anything so long as the focus is not themselves and the great emptiness that is their plans for government.

 

Facebook Comments Box

That last interview

If I did not have the habit of scrolling through the news on my phone while still in bed I would not have noticed that the Times was already half way through an interview with Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando by 7.30 am (corrigendum – One TV was, the Times was reporting). If that is not a sign that time is running out on this man’s relevance to the local scenario then I do not know what is.

The only reason his words are being rushed to “online” print as he speaks (rather than being kept for some yawn-inducing suspense until Sunday) is that the level of interest into what JPO has to say will probably be close to zilch by the time a particular meeting is over tonight.

The dentist has not changed one iota from March 2008 when his antics and shenanigans were intended to outwit Alfred Sant’s Labour in a battle of “con the people”. He may have switched allegiance insofar as the inspirations of spin are concerned but the final outcome is (ever so wrapped in poetic justice) same, same but different.

There is a simple logical premiss to be made behind all this. IF JPO really believes whatever he says he is believing then the only step available to him right now is to take his estranged self outside the body politic that is the Nationalist party. He obviously knows as much as everybody else that the only reason that he was not expelled from the party last week was  a matter of convenience – the PN is waiting for him to step out or at worst to be the cause of the premature end of government.

The hemlock had been served but rather than swallow it JPO “fights” on, probably believing that he is some kind of Samson about to bring the whole edifice tumbling down. His is a dirty game. There are no two ways about it. It is a game where values and principles are so far off track that they could be mistaken for whores at a harem.

His final grand “j’accuse” (not that he is worthy of such words) is a mass of conjecture that is being propped up (or isn’t) by a mixture of Labourite wannabe smartarses whose relationship with the truth is one of selective convenience. Worse than that it is more often than not a lack of truth based on a series of implications, insinuations and winks that can only shame the messenger and not the accused. The constant media harangue against the persona of Richard Cachia Caruana ever since the Labour Wikileaks fiasco has only produced a series of unfounded “impressions” and another series of allegations that have been swiftly denied.

The worst part (for JPO) is that the whole business on the agenda now has nothing to do with crude politics. This is far from a party split based on ideological dissent. It is personal. Very personal. Neither does JPO mention, for one second, any issue of governmental mismanagement – you know, of the kind Labour harps so much about. The main crux of his allegation now is some kind of collusion between RCC and Labour in 1996.

JPO knows that his is a lost cause. Hence his preparing the ground with such phrases as “fighting a lost battle”. Funnier still were such excuses as “if I see X and Y at the door I will simply walk out”.

Walk out he should have. Ages ago. Frankly he should never have walked in. When others preferred to waste their spin on alternattiva demokratika candidates remonstrating at Mistra in 2008 they should have focused on the man in sunglasses sitting on the rubble wall or sporting a china tea cup. They might have avoided this raging bull entering their china shop.

Now it’s up to them to pick up the broken pieces. Meanwhile the signs are even clearer that we will not have to wait for a long time for elections to be announced after the summer recess ends.

The lesson for the intelligent voter (if one was still needed) is that voting is not simply a matter of putting a number next to a party endorsed individual. (If you don’t believe me ask Franco on his new blog). You have to really ask yourself – who is this guy/lass I am voting for. After all we now  have a confirmation that the PLPN cannot be trusted when it comes to party endorsements.

Facebook Comments Box

The Powers of a President

Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando has been quoted by Malta today saying that “the President of the Republic would be justified in calling the Prime Minister to see if he has a majority after Franco Debono’s comments.” (see also on Maltastar). Well he wouldn’t. The President of the Republic need not take any such initiative because it is not up to him to do so. Our Constitution (God Bless the Paper it is written on) is quite clear about when the President may intervene with regards to the Prime Minister (and the leader of the opposition).

The Constitution

Everybody knows that the President appoints the member of the House who in his (the President’s) judgement is best able to command a majority of the members of that house. That situation arises “Whenever there shall be an occasion for the appointment of a Prime Minister” (article 80). On the other hand the Constitution is quite clear about the removal of the Prime Minister (article 81) and it that case it specifies quite clearly that this occurs: “If the House of Representatives passes a resolution, supported by the votes of a majority of all the members thereof, that it has no confidence in the Government, the President may remove the Prime Minister from office“.

You see Jeffrey. It is not up to the President to decide whether the PM still enjoys the support of the majority of members of the House. It is up to the House voting on a clear no confidence motion to do so. Had the drafters of our Constitution wanted to give the President the power to constantly use his own judgement – and not that of the House – in order to assess whether the PM commands a majority then we would have had an article similar to article 90(4):

90 (4) If, in the judgement of the President, a member of the House of Representatives other than the Leader of the Opposition, has become the Leader in the House of the opposition party having the greatest numerical strength in the House or, as the case may be, the Leader of the Opposition has ceased to command the support of the largest single group of members in opposition to Government, the President shall revoke the appointment of the Leader of the Opposition.

The constitutional provisions have already been ignored once in the Richard Cachia Caruana motion and procedures (article 111 in particular). We cannot afford to have politicians continue to ride roughshod on the constitution, observing only the parts of the law that are convenient to them. Abela’s mission in Peru is safe for now.

Punditry Revisited

I am led to believe that some observes sill imagine an extension of the life of this government beyond the reopening of parliament after recess ends. I disagree. The summer break is a reprieve and a chance for the PN to put its house in order. An election cannot be too long in the waiting once the summer break ends – if only for the simple obvious reason that one of either JPO and Debono will be prepared to vote against the government in a crucial confidence motion.

Whether Lawrence Gonzi is prepared to call their bluff – if only to let the blame of the end of government to fall squarely on their shoulders – is a matter of electoral brinkmanship. What we can say for certain is that this kind of midsummer rumbling is a prelude to the silence before the storm. Expect that silence to occur mid-August and the storm to hit you with a vengeance around September (if you’re still around and haven’t melted in the heat).

Facebook Comments Box