Categories
Arts

Bażar (A. Olivari)

Being so close to Italy and italianate forms of entertainment it is strange that this island of ours has not absorbed more of its more interesting forms of culture. The Italians have that culture of singing poets – cantautori – who entertain and challenge at the same time. Their ballads and music are snapshots of society and sometimes a reminder of what is going on – when everything else is going by too quickly and has not time to reflect. J’accuse is proud to bring to you one of Malta’s kantawturi of the 21st century: Antonio Olivari. A former blogger, Olivari has kindly shared this song from l-Ghanja tal-Poplu 2010. We love the lyrics and we love the tune.  Scroll down to the bottom to enjoy the sound…

Bażar

Inbigħ il-ħin ta’ ħajti għal salarju fix-xahar
Biex naqta’ xi ftit mid-dejn li għandi fuq id-dar
Inpartat id-dawl tax-xemx ma’ tubu qisu ta’ sptar
Jibqa’ sagħtejn kuljum libertà

…Inbigħ l-ambjent u l-art li għadhom mhux mittifsin
U l-arja nadifa tmur biex insuq u ntir
Ma’ żjara miraklu ntik xi toroq, ma jibqgħux imkissrin
L-aqwa li hemm il-kumdità

Inbigħ id-daħka minn ġol-mezzi tax-xandir
Riklam li jwiegħdek ġenna bil-kliem u l-viżwal fin
Il-gwerra l-isbaħ avventura fuq l-iskrin
L-attur li dejjem jirbaħ, joqtol lill-ħażin

Inbigħ il-kors li ħadt; studjajt u għaddejt dritt
Biex kumpannija tkompli żżid fuq il-profitt
Inpartat l-għerf ma’ kemm jirnexxili nkun fitt
F’kollox irrid il-kwantità

Inbigħ dil-melodija fuq ir-radjijiet
Il-vjaġġ ta’ wara l-ħajja f’kanzunetti tal-Milied
Inbigħ il-ferħ tat-tifkiriet li saru rmied
U magħhom se ntik verità

Kollox sar qligħ u sibna il-qiegħ tal-povertà

* Bazar – written by Antonio Olivari. Singer at the Ghanja tal-Poplu is Justin Galea.

Categories
Divorce Mediawatch Politics

Marriage (Behind Closed Doors)

Our “President Emeritus” (sic – the Times)  hath spoken: “It is good we are still bound to the principle that marriage is for life and we should be proud of this” – quoth he. Dr Fenech Adami reminded the world that marriage was a contract that bound the individuals for life and this was the principle at stake in the divorce debate. More importantly he rubbished the very strong pro-divorce argument that Malta only has the Philippines as it’s divorce-less partner (should I say wife?).

If you believed men like our “President Emeritus” you’d probably believe that the pro-divorce movement is only in favour of introducing divorce in order to be like others and not for the simple reason that they consider the right to marriage to essentially mean the right to a happy marriage in the long run.

Of course every marriage has its ups and downs but the Vatican-Malta-Philippine triangle would have it that no matter how “down” is “down” in that ups and downs bit, the “till death do us part” has to trump every other consideration. Fenech Adami is right – the basic principle at stake is the whole concept of indissolubility – marriage is marriage for life. Like giving animals as presents: it’s not just for Christmas/weddings but for life.

We all know that being pro-divorce does not mean wanting to better the Philippines or the Vatican State. It means opening a door to those people whose marriage has irretrievably broken down. It means a fresh start. It may not be a civil right in the strict sense of the term but living a happy marriage is an essential building block that inspires many of the civil rights recognised universally. Hiding behind closed doors while the broken couples continue to experience hideous realities without ever seeing a breakthrough is what Fenech Adami is proud of.

In terms of civil rights you can call it sweet F.A.

I wonder what the “President Emeritus” would make of this front page story on l-Orizzont:

TEJPS JĦINU SEPARAZZJONI
Il-Qorti tal-Familja laqgħet it-talba ta’ mara għas-separazzjoni minn ma’ żewġha, wara li fost oħrajn semgħet tejps li fihom ir-raġel jinstema’ jidgħi u joffendi lil martu. It-tejps kienu rrekordjati minn oħt il-mara li toqgħod fl-istess triq t’oħtha.

Il-mara talbet għas-separazzjoni għax skont hi żewġha ma kienx jistmaha. Skont hi, wara xahrejn miżżewġin huwa faqa’ l-bieb tal-kamra tal-banju, tliet snin wara kisser il-bieb tal-kamra tas-sodda u jumejn wara t-tkissir tal-bieb beda jkisser affarijiet fil-‘wall unit’.

B’kollox qalet li bidlet il-bieb tal-kamra tal-banju tliet darbiet, is-siġġijiet tal-kċina darbtejn u l-ħġieġ tal-‘wall unit’ kemm-il darba.Hija sostniet li binhom kien iqum bil-lejl jibki tant li kellha tieħdu għand il-professur li qalilha li binha kellu biża’ kbira.

Minbarra hekk sostniet li żewġha kien jheddi­dha li joqtolha, jqattagħha, jitfagħha f’għalqa u ħadd ma jsibha, li kien joffendiha b’ommha mej­ta u li kienet tarah f’għalqa ta’ ħuh ma’ tfajla u li darba sabitlu qalziet ta’ mara li ma kienx tagħha. Hija ppreżentat ukoll ittra li r-raġel tagħha allega­tament kiteb lil turista Ġermaniża fejn jgħi­dilha li jħobbha.

Fil-kawża xehdu wkoll xi ġirien, fosthom familjari tal-mara, li lkoll qalu li kienu jisimgħu lir-raġel jidħol lura d-dar fis-sakra u kienu jisimgħuh jidgħi, jgħajjas, isabbat u jitkellem ħażin. Fost dawn kien hemm oħtha li ippreżentat it-‘tapes’ fejn ir-raġel jinstema joffendi lil oħtha.

Xhud importanti kien it-tifel tal-koppja fejn dan qal li sa minn meta kellu sitt snin jiftakar lil missieru jirritorna d-dar fis-sakra, jidgħi, isabbat u jkisser. It-tifel qal li huwa kien jiekol fil-kamra tiegħu għax kien jibża’ jinżel isfel minħabba missieru u li missieru kien jgħajjru, joffendih u anke jgaralu l-affarijiet. (continue reading here)

Tinkwetax hanini. Ahseb kemm hemm nisa bhalek fil-Filippini. Dawk ukoll ghandhom kont il-bank biex ihallsu ghall-bibien. U meta tisma’ r-ragel jidghi ghid talba ghar-ruhu u ghal min ghandu mejjet.. fejn taf forsi ghad xi darba jilluminawhom lil tal-Vatikan?

Enhanced by Zemanta
Categories
Articles

J'accuse : Ambivalent

The latest viral trend in the fishpond that is our corner of social networking has Peppi Azzopardi announcing to the world that “his bed is his toilet” and Ira Losco sharing her deepest thoughts about mating every so often. The viral video in black and white also features John Bundy yelling “I am the king” and has been applauded (via virtual endorsements) and derided (via virtual comments and blogs) in equal measure.

Opinions being like genitalia − to each his own − the ideas and comments about the “Anti-Circus Animal Cruelty” video streamed in like SMS’ in a party fund-raising telethon. It was enough to turn a bland, kitschy and kindergarten-y message riddled with heretical pronunciation (Peppi manages to get “collar” to rhyme with “bollard”) into an overnight sensation: complete with a hundred and one critiques.

The first level of criticism came from the most common of circles in a Maltese inferno: envy disguised as disdain. In our usual convoluted thinking we had first decided that this was a video stuffed with what counts, in our corner of the universe, as a celebrity. According to some critics of the critics (bear with me), the criticism being levelled was simply an attempt to ride on the wave of attention currently being afforded to the video thanks to its instant virality. In other words, according to some, the anti-celebs who were criticising the video were just in it for a piece of the action.

Il rumore che fa il cellophan

Amusing really. Andy Warhol must have been giggling his Technicolor arse off in his grave. Talk about 15 minutes of fame being drawn out of proportion. Beyond the jealousies and counter-jealousies of what constitutes celeb status in today’s Facebook comment world there were other dimensions of criticism. The most obvious − and one to which J’accuse wholeheartedly subscribed − was directed at the attempted massacre of English pronunciation that could be witnessed in the Anglophone version of the vid.

Bar Jamie Pace, the rest of the anti-animal cruelty testimonials were enough to inspire a potential parallel video designed for a campaign to save the English language. While the script was ok-ish − if you’re ok with the personification of animals and the not so subtle sous-entendues on sex and gestation and pelosity − the delivery was as easy on the ears as a piece of chalk grating a blackboard incessantly. Again we demonstrated an incredible dexterity in turning any minor point into a full-blown Oprah session.

In the left corner we had those defending Peppi’s Minglish stating brazenly that it is just as valid a version of English as a Jamaican’s or a Scot’s. In the other corner we had those bemoaning the death of the Queen’s English − such as that gleaned in the halls of Zurich when Prince William managed to pronounce the word “football” making it sound like the most alien of sports (could that be the reason of their failure)? And there we went again − as though a jukebox had just swallowed the latest dime and the record had clicked into place, spun to the required revs per minute and the same old tune played to the assembled regulars.

Quanta strada nei miei sandali

It was not all fishponds and buscades though. Out of the stagnant cesspit of predictable disquisition shone the ray of hope in the form of a Cedric Vella remix. The remixed version of the video took a night to make (I am told by blogger “markbiwwa”) and is worth a visit. Satire and irony has its own way of biting through the morbid morosity of our navel-gazing fraternity and when it does so it provides us with such pearls as this. Look it up on Youtube. You’ll thank me later.

We swing incredibly from moments of blissful ambivalence (described crudely in the vernacular by the acronym ABZ) to Victor Meldrew-like interference worked into a fanatical frenzy. Whether we are dissecting the content of a promo video or whether we are passing judgement on the decision to host a former PM in a corner of St Vincent de Paule, we are often allowing our buttons to be pressed for whatever purposes the button pushers may have.

Take the Dwejra incident. In my little head I was troubled by Mark Anthony Falzon’s willingness to summarily dismiss the warnings about an eco-system (however unattractive) by using a semi-sophisticated version of the ABZ argument. It is easy to pick up the virus of ambivalent nonchalance − sometimes simply in an effort to insulate oneself from the nonsensical assaults perpetrated by the media of spin. The danger lies in not recognising the good story when it is there staring at you in the face (or lying under the sand in Dwejra).

A volte si sono scontrose (oppure hanno voglia di fare pipi)

Just look at Wikileaks and all the ruckus being made about Julian Assange’s toy. It was cool at the start. Then slowly it dawned on many of us that the coolness was more about the medium than about the content. A question I asked J’accuse readers this week was “What do you make of Wikileaks?” I am not concerned with assessing whether it is “good” or “evil” but rather whether people believe it could have an effect in some way. Assange seems to think that it is one way in which we could keep the USA in check. Really?

Governments have always had dispatches from their ambassadors and spies in other countries. It is useful to know what your friends are up to as much as it is to pick the brain of your enemy. Or as Shun-Tsu once said: keep your friends close and your enemies closer. We cannot be surprised or outraged when a correspondent cables that Berlusconi is lax with women or sends similar “judgements” about other politicians. We might not like it but hey, it’s world player informing itself about the other players around the table. Expecting political correctness in the cables defies reason.

Of course the leaks have had their repercussions. EU officials claim that there might be a loss of goodwill in US relations and heightened tension in the Middle East. Given that even the publication of cartoons in Denmark can heighten tension in the Middle East and that we should never really trust the Yanks blindly, I don’t think there is much that is new there either. On a local basis, unless the cables have anything interesting about Gonzi’s phone calls (or lack of them) with Ehud Olmert then we can really get back to wondering what is the best way to pronounce “collar”.

Tra i francesi che s’incazzano

Mario Monicelli jumped out of a fifth floor window to free his mind from this earthly prison. In one of his last interviews with RAI, Monicelli complains about how the Italian nation is always sadly waiting for its big saviour who will put things right. The first big saviour screwed it all up by going to war and the last one in the queue simply just cannot get his priorities right. Mario had seen the decline of this society of ours and its principles long before he took his one-way flight ticket out of this world.

At 95 Mario might have been entitled to Exit, stage right, without spending another minute on a world that was beginning to seem all too alien for him. In a way it is easy to sympathise. We seem to be ageing at an alarmingly faster rate than people used to, say, 20 years ago. By that I do not mean that I have discovered some new quantum physics flaw that explains that time is moving faster. What I do mean is that the speed of change around us (and more particularly of the things that we are used to having around us) is increasing exponentially.

I found myself wondering where I would be in 2022 when the World Cup would be hosted in air-conditioned stadiums in Qatar. The Qatar delegation has promised stadiums that can be dismantled and 3D pictures that will be screened in stadiums around the world. I am sure that by that time they will manage to come up with other marvels of technology that will turn the whole business into an all-new experience. And who knows… if we’re talking miracles… England might win the World Cup. The Three Lion delegation was mightily miffed by FIFA’s choice and I am still baffled as to why they were so surprised.

The whole process − seen through the eyes of the Brit press (barring the cheering Scots of course) had an ambivalent attitude about it. There was Blatter (here was another one with comedic pronunciation) with his football-dollars (rhymes with collars) proudly breaking new barriers in football hosting and there were the English positively pissed off by his constant references to China as the founders of football. They just don’t get it do they? What have the English given football? Really? David Beckham? He might as well be making Anti-Animal Cruelty Videos… though come to think of it I’m not quite sure he’d have the right diction.

Bartali

The lyrics of Paolo Conte’s song Bartali have accompanied us on this article. This week I revived Blogs of Malta: a site that serves as a meeting place for Maltese bloggers old and new: http://blogmalta.ning.com. I strongly recommend two animated pictures currently at the cinema (at least in Luxembourg). Both Megamind and Despicable Me guarantee giggles and fun for all the family.

It was less of a laughing matter over at Transport Malta this week. I am deeply saddened by the unfortunate and unnecessary pain caused, among others, to Major Ripard. I had more than one occasion in the past to speak to Major Ripard and discuss our traffic and transport woes (egged on by more teasing relatives). Major Ripard is a shining example of the rare breed of old school, dedicated servants of the state. Only an ambivalent country such as ours could host the ironic situation in which a graduate from a military academy ends up losing a limb in the “line of duty” − discussing the improvement of traffic safety on our roads.

I wish Major Ripard and his colleagues a swift return to their routine of normality and hope that the perpetrator/s of such an inhuman attack be swiftly brought to justice. Most of all I do hope that justice does not hold up the mirror of ambivalence but that it metes out the right punishment.

That’s all from frozen Luxembourg.

www.akkuza.com is also registered on Blogs of Malta: blogmalta.ning.com. Don’t forget to register if you have your own blog.

Categories
Mediawatch

Fishponds and Circuses

As far as virals go nothing could be more remotely uninteresting than the bland anti-circus promo that is going around on Facebook. Thank god for creative fellas like Cedric Vella who has breathed some life and humour into the whole thing using good old satyre and a remix. Blogger Markbiwwa alerted us to the alternative version while Mona is moaning about the original back at her hut while doing a Mrs Slocombe, stroking her pussy. We did think that Daphne’s definition of fishpondism was very apt for much of the local scene. Here’s one that wins this months trophy: The One About the Celebs doing the Circus Animal Thingy Protest.

No blogs were harmed in the making of this post. Time to plug the Blogs of Malta network that is back up and running.

The Original

The Remix (Cedric Vella)

Categories
Mediawatch

Information Overload?

The Subtle Roar of Online Whistle-blowing: Jul...
Image by New Media Days via Flickr

Wikileaks. It’s on everyone’s lips and laptops and risks becoming the first real flicker of life in some rudimentary form of global democracy. Or not. Until recently social collaboration and networking had their strongest point in the immediacy of transmission of information. Students rallied in record time and revolutions of the oppressed could be masterminded and managed over twitter and other social networks. Local (and national) scenarios have for some time included information centres that set up as an alternative to the traditional MSM and provide different information to the realities being spun in accordance to tradition (or requirements of the centres of power).

Enter Wikileaks and controversial founder Julian Assange. The man is now the subject of a virtual death warrant. It’s actually an arrest warrant by interpol issued on the basis of an allegation of rape. The timing of the arrest warrant could not have been better fuel for conspiracy theorists – it comes at a moment when Wikileaks is busy embarrassing the world’s largest superpower (at least military). Having said that it is interesting to observe the different stakeholders in the battleground over information sources. Amazon has just dumped Wikileaks from its servers : a clear sign of “go it alone baby”. While the leaking of diplomatic cables and information has been described as life threatening it is also prudent to wonder who or what benefits from these leaks exactly.

In a clearly functioning democracy, of the separation of powers kind, new information thrown into the public domain by third parties can serve to uncover the ruthlessness or corruption that might be setting in at the top. How does that work in a quasi-anarchic global system? Is outing American notions on Berlusconi’s lascivious entertainment preferences of benefit to anyone? I am sure it is but the question is to whom? To the Italian electorate? To the US electorate? And what message does it send to someone in (spin the wheel)… Tajikistan?

The question I am asking here is not so much the black or white “Is the Wikileaks good or bad?” but rather whether such random leakage actually has an effect beyond the sensational. Sure the press will have a free run for a while and the diplomatic centres around the world will have a new topic on their social agenda. Spies have been rendered redundant for a while (a very short while) and so on. But is Assange justified in stating that he has made the US in any way more accountable? On a more local (or national, pace Tonio) scenario you could compare the leaks to the random bandying of information on government contracts: sometimes the bull is hit and things get going. Most times the allegations and hunches serve simply to get the press heated for a little while. My concern is more on how a leak could be channelled to be less of a leak and more of a substantiated form of information that can hit where it hurts if necessary.

Otherwise leaks will just do what leaks always do… create a mess for which nobody is prepared to take responsibility and ones that nobody is prepared to fix. And we’ve got enough of that kind of shit on our hands.

addendum:

From Wikileaks: Lack of Information isn’t the problem (Steve Richards, Independent) :

Their words are reported in the brightest of colours because they were not written for public consumption. A locked door is open. As we look inside we discover that one of the revelations about the Wikileaks publications is that they are not revelatory. They confirm publicly available information and take us behind the scenes, like a tour of a theatre for an audience that has already seen the production. If the stories of recent days are reversed, they would have been mind-blowing exclusives: “Mervyn King called for increases in public spending!”; “Israel relaxed about Iran’s nuclear ambitions!” Instead, the mechanism of a leak generates excitement over predictable and unsurprising information. In this case the leak is on such a gargantuan scale that the intake of breath is even greater. But it is the mechanism that is sensational, not the words that arrive as a result.


Enhanced by Zemanta
Categories
Rubriques

The Confines of the Internet

I was assailed  by a sad thought while contemplating the shopping strategy for the purchase of the Secret Santa present at the work Christmas lunch. Without hesitating for even a second I had already subconsciously calculated that I would be in time to order the product – whatever it was – over the internet. And that was the sad part. Convenience had finally trumped over trudging through cold and ice and wading through a human mass of consumers. I would sit lazily at a console (the cool word that fits laptop, desktop or handheld equally) and browse the shopping halls and alleys of the ether.

I shall search, yes, but not indiscriminately and serendipitally as I would do at the Trier or Metz Christmas market. My mind will focus on particular, specific products and thanks to the google hegemony (bing? what’s that?) I shall be directed to outlets of choice and be a few clicks away from my final purchase. The only obstacle I might have is to be found in the physical delivery of the goods. Pauly the Postman might be stuck behind piles of snow or some last minute strike just in time for the festive season. There might also be one of the usual misunderstandings between web and real world such as DHL refusing to leave the package with the Pack Up Delivery system at the local post office because I am not there to receive it (which totally defeats the purpose).

The internet may have opened new horizons of practicality with its ever open, ever available and ever stocked markets but it has taken something out of the magic of Christmas shopping. So this Christmas, even if you plan most of your shopping on the net, do dedicate a day to good old fashioned Christmas adventure – take the kids out to Republic Street and let them marvel at the atmosphere and music. Buy them a couple of warm “imqaret” on the way in, run them from one shop to the other like there is no tomorrow and if possible “lose” them … yes, lose them, for a few minutes until they can see the Christmas lights through the tears forming in their eyes just before you scoop them to safety.

It may sound cruel, but it’s the kind of nostalgic experience that  they will surely remember when they grow up – not your office chair and bedside slippers as you click “Add to Cart” and fill up Santa’s Trolley.

Enhanced by Zemanta