Categories
Mediawatch Politics

Vella Gera Charged

Li Tkisser Sewwi author Alex Vella Gera has been interrogated by the police and is to be summoned to court on the 20th of April. 

The author is now facing the same charges as Mr Camilleri and the court case is expected to be heard on April 20. Mr Camilleri is being charged with breaching Article 208 of the Criminal Code, which deals with the distribution of pornographic or obscene material among others, which could lead to a prison sentence of up to six months or a fine of up to €465.87. He is also being charged with Articles 3 and 7 of the Press Act, which in this case deal with printed matter directly or indirectly “injuring public morals or decency”. Under these charges, guilty parties could face up to three months in prison or a fine. (Times)

So the story lingers on and with it will linger the hundred questions Maltese society is failing to answer about censorship and gagging. You could argue that at this point it is less about censorship than about our “public morals and decency” as read and expressed through the medium of writing. A condemnation of Vella Gera and Camilleri would not just be a statement on morals though it would be a gagging order for those who dare (because the mere writing and expressing certain thoughts becomes a dare) write similar stuff in the future – so there would be no doubt that this is pre-emptive censorship of some kind. The law is there to be applied. There is no doubt that the interpreters of the law will be called upon to assess what the levels of “public morals and decency” are – this time public morality will be judged away from the baying rabble – which is a good point at least because the law does not have the ulterior motives of the baying rabble (be they christian fundamentalist, politically biased or simply modern day pharisees).

Interestingly, the police might have to take into consideration those on the net who have been “audacious” enough to reproduce the story that appeared on Realtà. Early on in the saga a couple of websites deemed it necessary to throw down the gauntlet and show their support by publishing Li Tkisser Sewwi in its entirety. J’accuse chose not to and we gave our reasons why – even though we do not agree with the interpretation of “public morals and decency” being given.  The police have a problem on their hands. If they are consistent then blog owners should be arraigned in court on the same charges as Mark Camilleri. You see, as I told Kenneth Zammit Tabona in a comment on his Times piece yesterday, blogs are not ex lege and fall within the same laws as, say, newspapers.

This is not an incitement or egging on of the police. It is a call for consistency. I sincerely hope that Mark Camilleri, Alex Vella Gera and whoever else is arraigned in court on this business is acquitted. The acquittal should come on the basis of what I believe to be a proper interpretation of “public morality and decency” as well as “distribution of pornographic material”. A new line is being drawn in that courtroom – a new assessment of the state of the nation – morality wise. It is a battle of sorts that requires a clear-headed reasoning which looks not only at where we are coming from but also where many of us aspire to be going. In this particular battle it is important to consider the whole nation of individuals as well as the common good. The outcome of this battle risks making many of us exiles within our own nation – no longer able to identify parts of themselves with the rest of the population.

As for other blogs and publication – the reason J’accuse believes more arraignments should be on the agenda is straightforward. Particularly at this moment in time when we are running a clear and present risk of alienating large swathes of the population from the powerful tools of the internet, it must be made clear that like any other medium the internet and publications thereupon fall within the scrutiny of the long arm of the law. People like Daphne Caruana Galizia who published the story knowingly, purposely and with the declared intention of being prosecuted (see quote below) should be prosecuted for the very reason of giving a clear message to anybody who is doubting it: blogs and the internet are also subject to the law. Not only do we believe that Daphne should be prosecuted for the sake of coherence of the law – but we also believe that Alex, Mark and Daphne should be acquitted – for the sanity of our nation’s future.

Regardless of the merits of the story, I am publishing it in solidarity with the editor, a 21-year-old history student, and with the student newspaper, which like all student newspapers is there to experiment and push the boundaries – or should be. If the police don’t prosecute me for publishing it, then they can’t prosecute him either. And if they prosecute me, we’ll all have a ball (and leave them just one, like Hitler, to be getting on with). – DCG, 7.11.09

Here’s to hoping that the “ball” results in a clear message in favour of the freedom of expression. If the law is something we do not agree with then we should do all that is legally possible to try to change it (or the current interpretation there is of it) – but we can never ever be led to believe that anyone is above the law.

We are all servants of the law, so that we may be free.

(The Bertoon first appeared on the Malta Independent on Sunday on the 8th November 2009 – accompanying the article “Offensive Behaviour

***

Press Release from the Front Kontra c-Censura

As soon as the police realised that Alex Vella Gera was in the Courts to give his witness in the case Police against Editor of Ir-Realta’, Mark Camilleri, ordered him to wait for him after the court session,so as to ask him to be interrogated. Alex Vella Gera came to testify on the request of the Defense. He co-operated fully with the police and was interrogated by Inspector Jesmond Micallef. The police have filed criminal charges against Alex Vella Gera for writing a story about a fictional character with a sexist attitude, called Li Tkisser Sewwi, which was published in the 8th issue of Ir-Realta’.

The Front Against Censorship would like to give its total solidarity to Alex Vella Gera, a young and innovative artist who is being persecuted by the police of Malta. This persecution is a direct attack on the world of art and literature and the Front abhors the way the police are handling the situation, as they are making it worse as time goes by. It is greatly hypocritical of the police to persecute writers who write stories about sexism instead of concentrating more on persecuting pimps, tackling the problem of domestic violence and ignoring sexual and racial discrimination. There are no excuses which justify these authoritarian acts and the feeble statement that the police are just doing their job is totally false. If they were doing their job, they would tackle the problems mentioned earlier and not persecute innovative artists and critical editors.

The Front regrets the fact that the Minister of Justice has no problem with the authoritarian actions of the police and is frustrated that since its inception, the Minister has failed to address this problem by checking the authoritarian actions of the police, who now have turned out to be Malta’s prime literary critics.

Facebook Comments Box

19 replies on “Vella Gera Charged”

Jacques, this isn’t just about ‘the law’. It’s also profoundly about politics and the atmosphere created by the Catholic integristes in power. They will defend their patch tooth and nail. Are we ready to defend ours with similar force?

Are you?

It’s not just about the law but the law is the proper forum to resolve it. Otherwise you risk having ass-philosophers like the comment below acting as impromptu judges.

The law will always remain the arbiter of “public morality and decency”. Judges and magistrates have the duty to try to read into society and come up with their assessment of what the lawmakers intended when they asked them to uphold public morality and decency.

Sure. Fight the battle. Tooth and nail. But I refuse to battle ignorance with ignorance. Otherwise you get ass talk. You have to be prepared to face the truth and the truth might even mean that the judgement of the courts, interpreting the will of the lawmakers who had legislated for the people COULD VERY WELL BE that our public morality, decency etc does not allow stories like Vella Gera’s to be published because our public morality etc could be offended.

Now what do you mean by fighting tooth and nail? Falling for the antics of rabble rousers like idiots who easily fall prey to generalisations that the law is an ass? Do you want a revolution that overthrows parliament and changes the laws to suit the liberal faction? Shall we impeach all judges who cannot get themsleves to see that there are people in this country who can read that piece without considering it porn or offensive?

I don’t think so. The reason people like Charlie here do not have a law degree is because the law is much more profound than gut reactions. Yes Charles, it’s another J’accuse swipe separating the ignorant from the knowledgeable. Call it personal if you like Charles, but what I am saying is a factual assessment – your reading of the situation is uninformed and dangerous – of the kind that is easily preyed upon by sensationalist spinners who love pressing the wrong buttons and yelling Jump just to see how high you go.

Back to DF. The reason I stress solving the issue legally is twofold. One way of winning the argument for the liberal side is to win the first battle in court. The other is to go on challenging the influence of those you call Catholic integristes and what I call the systemic run to the race to mediocrity. The first battle can be won by a sound argument in court.

I’m afraid the second battle of greater change still requires the same elusive answer: a political party detached from the sorry PLPN mentality. Are you ready to use that force?

There is the law. Then there is justice. A concept which seems to be completely alien to your breed.

“your breed”? Charles. You never cease to surprise.

Here’s some homework for you to contemplate. “Obtaining justice without a proper system of laws. Discuss.”

Somehow (just somehow) I think your free thinking is being blocked by a constant irritating thought. Your idol is currently on a crusade trying to prove that one magistrate is not fit to fulfil her role. In you rmind that automatically means that the legal system (har har let’s kill all the lawyers har har the judges are all corrupt har har) is no longer the right place to obtain justice. Sure – I vote we start trial by blog. After all bloggers never act on impulse or out of spite do they?

Did I put too much on your plate? Charles?

“The Law Is A Ass – A Idiot”
We should all respect the Ass. And Lawyers. And Magistrates.

After all, the three monkeys had the right idea.

Law underpins ‘culture’ within society.

Law is hugely complex in nature. It is not a science. It is fiercely dynamic edifice.

Within this complicated structure, democracy demands that the power of a police force must be mostly separate from sovereign authority.

In this instance, one is bound to ask – is the action of the Police force sufficiently detached from that of sovereign power?

I personally find vella gera’s the most intellectually artistically and stimulating piece of maltese literature i have read these last twelve months.

That the author is facing police action is to me acutely disturbing, like having the clark doing away with gerome’s slave market for being pornographic.

Now Jacques is here providing a mature dispassionate and sound analysis of a way forward; a landmark stand that will establish values that one expects to apply in any given normal society away from wholesale mediocrity?

yet when one recalls how men of the cloth called for police action when the issue first came to our attention, (plus nadur etc) I get a feeling that here we may have a challenge to the concept of a pluralistic society.

A word to us who want to defend our patch.

I attended the censorship protest in valletta held weeks ago. we must be careful not to come across as a group of youngsters pushing a libertinagg agenda.

The situation calls for sturdy nerves and clear mind; no illusions of support in numbers. The total support of a clinical few will.

That will be enough. So set up legal and political/marketing team and for heaven’s sake, this is not the time for protests, it is time for implementation.

In this instance, one is bound to ask – is the action of the Police force sufficiently detached from that of sovereign power?

And why does this instance give you any reason to doubt that that principle was en vigeur?

good question fausto. perhaps till now, one felt comfortable looking the other way as it was considered inevitable that malta will continue to take erratically slow but gradual steps towards becoming a normal nation.

But these last 24 months hints at a carefully crafted action-plan that may be seeking to install Malta-in-the-eu as the archetypal catholic-conservative-no divorce-no art-church-school dominated-no carnival-no sex talk-no women that work, absolute anti-relativist gouderized bastion within the eu, to be held up as a model for the rest of europe to adopt post depression. I mean father mark summoned to rome on the promptings of the bishop…come on…charlemagne must be popping champaign in his grave.

Hi Kenneth,
You are right, you did. You also pointed out that many people have the wrong impression about blogs being outside immune from the law – and I continued on that observation. Please accept my apologies if I came across as meaning that you believed the opposite to be the case.

And two months ago you were hoping “that Mark Camilleri and Alex Vella Gera end up behind bars for a sensible period of time”.

I’d like to know what changed your mind but there’s a more burning question since you seem unable to snap out of that particular topic: weren’t you hoping the same thing for Daphne?

Right you are Fausto and here is my explanation:

At the time, as now, I was hoping that there would be an increased awareness for society to notice that it is high time we asked ourselves once again what are our standards of public morality. The full length of my quote before you gave it the Bondiplus treatment was:

“If they did not get the message till now then we can only hope (no hard feelings guys) that Mark Camilleri and Alex Vella Gera end up behind bars for a sensible period of time (judging by current standards of course).”

That was because I meant that if current standards are still such that we perceive Alex’s and Mark’s deeds as immoral and indecent (and do not appreciate their literary value) then only a prison sentence would serve to open the eyes of the greater public and hopefully provoke David’s much hoped for revolution.

How is that consonant with what I say today re: acquittal? Well, an acquittal of Mark, Daphne and Alex would mean that the magistrate interpreting the law interpreted them in such a way as not to find their actions immoral or indecent and that he was led to interpret them through proper argumentation in the right forum.

As an aside – your selective quoting really makes me wonder whether sometimes you are just here to take the mickey. Still. Better a fausto than a cauchi any day.

As an aside – your selective quoting really makes me wonder whether sometimes you are just here to take the mickey.

Ah! The eternal dilemma of Faustologists worldwide! As one of my mentors would say: serious fooling is always preferable to foolish seriousness.

@Fausto – “Faustologists worldwide”???? As in the 10 of them in Malta, Luxembourg, and Brussels? Or the many thousands who follow you in silent adoration Moonie-style? Still agree with Jacques that preferable to “Charles”

Comments are closed.